|
This step involves the intersection between the previous two
- where estimated consequences the alternatives developed in
Step 3 are presented in terms of the objectives and evaluation
criteria developed in Step 2.
This step is primarily an analytical task, involving the
assignment of consequences, NOT the assessment of value-based
judgments about the relative importance of those consequences or
the identification of a preferred alternative. This step is
usually undertaken by scientists, economists and specialists in
traditional ecological knowledge.
Contents:
Introduction
The Consequence Table
Recognizing and Incorporating Uncertainty
|
Step 4 is an analytical exercise in which the
performance of each alternative is estimate in terms of
the evaluation criteria.